Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-16432

Revisit the asynchronous ipc implementation

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Umbrella
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 2.0.0
    • rpc
    • None

    Description

      Seems the current approach of implementing AsyncTable is in trouble as we expose some netty classes in our public interfaces.

      I agree that we should not do this. The AsyncTable should be implemented using the asynchronous protobuf stub, and we could use CompletableFuture or Deferred instead of netty's Future. I think the problem of netty's future is that it is tighten with netty's executor. This makes it impossible to use without netty.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          blocks

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. HBASE-13784 Add Async Client Table API

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. HBASE-15921 Add first AsyncTable impl and create TableImpl based on it

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed
          There are no Sub-Tasks for this issue.

          Activity

            People

              zhangduo Duo Zhang
              zhangduo Duo Zhang
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: