Uploaded image for project: 'Guacamole'
  1. Guacamole
  2. GUACAMOLE-244

Allow configuration of LDAP alias dereferencing

    Details

      Description

      Similar to referral following, it is useful in certain situations to allow the user to decide if aliases should be dereferenced or not:

      • An admin may want to create a separate area for users or connections and just alias the users rather than moving or creating them there.
      • Such areas in the LDAP tree might already exist, and might cause problems (e.g. duplicate users) if someone is querying an entire tree and dereferencing aliases.

      Further clarification from Nick Couchman in the discussion for incubator-guacamole-client PR #131:

      ... in my past history of running LDAP servers, I've run into a couple of situations where the ability to configure how the LDAP client handled dereferencing of aliases was almost, if not, essential, to being able to use LDAP.

      Consider an LDAP tree where the main user account section is ou=People,dc=example,dc=com, and a separate section specifically for users with VPN access is ou=VPN_Users,dc=example,dc=com. The entries in the ou=VPN_Users section are aliases to the actual object in the ou=People section, allowing the tree to remain organized, but providing a separate section that can be queried specifically for users who need VPN access.

      Here are the following situations:

      • If you query the base of the tree, at dc=example,dc=com, alias dereferencing is enabled, you'll come away with duplicate objects - for example, cn=Nick Couchman,ou=VPN_Users,dc=example,dc=com will show up, as will cn=Nick Couchman,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com. For some LDAP clients that base their naming on the cn= property, for example, this will cause errors because of the duplicate accounts. Being able to turn off alias dereferencing in these situations is very useful, as it allows the tree to be organized and divided for certain applications but also searchable a the root level for others.
      • Conversely, if you wanted, for example, to allow access to Guacamole for the folks who are aliased in the ou=VPN_Users area, and not have to move their accounts, you would need alias dereferencing to be enabled and then you'd point the base of your search at the ou=VPN_Users,dc=example,dc=com part of the LDAP tree, and it would appear as if those users were in that location, even though they are simply linked to the real objects.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          mike.jumper Michael Jumper added a comment -

          I'll copy what you've written here into the description.

          Show
          mike.jumper Michael Jumper added a comment - I'll copy what you've written here into the description.
          Hide
          nick.couchman@yahoo.com Nick Couchman added a comment -

          Similar to referral following, it is useful in certain situations to allow the user to decide if aliases should be dereferenced or not:

          • An admin may want to create a separate area for users or connections and just alias the users rather than moving or creating them there.
          • Such areas in the LDAP tree might already exist, and might cause problems (e.g. duplicate users) if someone is querying an entire tree and dereferencing aliases.

          I'll have a pull request sometime this weekend...

          Show
          nick.couchman@yahoo.com Nick Couchman added a comment - Similar to referral following, it is useful in certain situations to allow the user to decide if aliases should be dereferenced or not: An admin may want to create a separate area for users or connections and just alias the users rather than moving or creating them there. Such areas in the LDAP tree might already exist, and might cause problems (e.g. duplicate users) if someone is querying an entire tree and dereferencing aliases. I'll have a pull request sometime this weekend...

            People

            • Assignee:
              mike.jumper Michael Jumper
              Reporter:
              nick.couchman@yahoo.com Nick Couchman
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development