Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.5.2
-
None
Description
It looks like a new field type "passkey" was added in the KSM vault, and whenever a record is edited in the vault, it may add this new field, which blows up the attempt to fetch records using the KSM SDK with the following error:
kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.JsonDecodingException: Polymorphic serializer was not found for class discriminator 'passkey' JSON input: {"type":"passkey","value":[]} at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.JsonExceptionsKt.JsonDecodingException(JsonExceptions.kt:24) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.JsonExceptionsKt.JsonDecodingException(JsonExceptions.kt:32) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.PolymorphicKt.throwSerializerNotFound(Polymorphic.kt:76) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.PolymorphicKt.decodeSerializableValuePolymorphic(Polymorphic.kt:66) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.StreamingJsonDecoder.decodeSerializableValue(StreamingJsonDecoder.kt:38) at kotlinx.serialization.encoding.AbstractDecoder.decodeSerializableValue(AbstractDecoder.kt:43) at kotlinx.serialization.encoding.AbstractDecoder.decodeSerializableElement(AbstractDecoder.kt:70) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.StreamingJsonDecoder.decodeSerializableElement(StreamingJsonDecoder.kt:111) at kotlinx.serialization.encoding.CompositeDecoder$DefaultImpls.decodeSerializableElement$default(Decoding.kt:537) at kotlinx.serialization.internal.CollectionLikeSerializer.readElement(CollectionSerializers.kt:80) at kotlinx.serialization.internal.AbstractCollectionSerializer.readElement$default(CollectionSerializers.kt:51) at kotlinx.serialization.internal.AbstractCollectionSerializer.merge(CollectionSerializers.kt:36) at kotlinx.serialization.internal.AbstractCollectionSerializer.deserialize(CollectionSerializers.kt:43) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.PolymorphicKt.decodeSerializableValuePolymorphic(Polymorphic.kt:59) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.StreamingJsonDecoder.decodeSerializableValue(StreamingJsonDecoder.kt:38) at kotlinx.serialization.encoding.AbstractDecoder.decodeSerializableValue(AbstractDecoder.kt:43) at kotlinx.serialization.encoding.AbstractDecoder.decodeSerializableElement(AbstractDecoder.kt:70) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.StreamingJsonDecoder.decodeSerializableElement(StreamingJsonDecoder.kt:111) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.KeeperRecordData$$serializer.deserialize(RecordData.kt:9) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.KeeperRecordData$$serializer.deserialize(RecordData.kt:9) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.PolymorphicKt.decodeSerializableValuePolymorphic(Polymorphic.kt:59) at kotlinx.serialization.json.internal.StreamingJsonDecoder.decodeSerializableValue(StreamingJsonDecoder.kt:38) at kotlinx.serialization.json.Json.decodeFromString(Json.kt:100) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.SecretsManager.decryptRecord(SecretsManager.kt:1151) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.SecretsManager.fetchAndDecryptSecrets(SecretsManager.kt:618) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.SecretsManager.getSecrets(SecretsManager.kt:323) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.SecretsManager.getSecrets$default(SecretsManager.kt:322) at com.keepersecurity.secretsManager.core.SecretsManager.getSecrets(SecretsManager.kt) at org.apache.guacamole.vault.ksm.secret.KsmClient.validateCache(KsmClient.java:269)
Thankfully, it looks like support for the new "passkey" field type was added in the 16.5.3 version of the SDK, so fixing this should hopefully be as easy as updating the KSM SDK version:
https://github.com/Keeper-Security/secrets-manager/tree/master/sdk/java/core#readme