Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
Description
See following simple script:
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic; @CompileStatic void printList(List l){ println "List:" for (Object o in l) {println o} println "Done" } printList(null)
It crashes with null pointer exception due to list being null in the for loop. However it works perfectly fine when CompileStatic annotation is removed. I believe this inconsistency is a bug as the whole point of introducing a new for-in construct in groovy appeared to be to make it a null safe construct (unlike for (Object o: l) construct in java). However, when compiling statically, it seems to be compiled as the java iterator it replaces, breaking away from groovy convention without even a warning.
Any chance to have it fixed in 3.x?