Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.8.5
-
None
-
Windows XP and LINUX
Description
If a constant in a sub-interface replaces/shadows a constant in a super interface (both Java), when trying to access the sub-interface's constant value from Groovy, the behaviour is intermittantly incorrect - sometimes the sub-interface's value is returned (correct) and sometimes the super interface's value is returned (incorrect).
In Java the sub-interface's value is always returned, as expected.
See source code below that demonstrates this: InterfaceA.java, InterfaceB.java, ShowBugGroovy.groovy, ShowBugJava.java
If ShowBugGroovy is repeatedly run, sometimes the assertion fails, sometimes it passes (randomly?). I believe the behaviour is the same for concrete implementations of the sub-interface.
package groovybug; public interface InterfaceA { String FOO="Foo A"; }
package groovybug; public interface InterfaceB extends InterfaceA { String FOO="Foo B"; }
package groovybug class ShowBugGroovy { static main(args) { println("Interface A: " + InterfaceA.FOO); println("Interface B: " + InterfaceB.FOO); // Fails randomly assert(InterfaceA.FOO!=InterfaceB.FOO) } }
package groovybug; public class ShowBugJava { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Interface A: " + InterfaceA.FOO); System.out.println("Interface B: " + InterfaceB.FOO); // Always passes assert(!InterfaceA.FOO.equals(InterfaceB.FOO)); } }
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
GROOVY-5335 Constants defined in sub-interfaces which hide super-interface constants evaluate unpredictably
- Closed