Groovy
  1. Groovy
  2. GROOVY-3276

Enums in 1.6-RC-1 no longer work with constructors with multiple parameters

        Details

        • Type: Bug Bug
        • Status: Closed
        • Priority: Critical Critical
        • Resolution: Fixed
        • Affects Version/s: 1.6-rc-1
        • Fix Version/s: 1.6-rc-2, 1.5.8, 1.7-beta-1
        • Component/s: None
        • Labels:
          None
        • Environment:
          XP, cygwin,
          java version "1.6.0"
          Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b105)
          Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0-b105, mixed mode)

          Description

          In 1.6 RC1 it seems to no longer be possible for an enum constructor to take more than one parameter. This works fine in 1.5.7:

          enum Foo {
          A(1,2),
          B(3,4)

          Foo(int xx, int yy)

          { x=xx y=yy }

          public int x
          public int y
          }

          Foo.A.x

          gives:

          Exception thrown: null

          java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError

          at ConsoleScript38.class$(ConsoleScript38)

          at ConsoleScript38.$get$$class$Foo(ConsoleScript38)

          at ConsoleScript38.run(ConsoleScript38:14)

          Caused by: groovy.lang.GroovyRuntimeException: Could not find matching constructor for: Foo(java.lang.String, java.lang.Integer, java.util.ArrayList)

          at Foo.$INIT(ConsoleScript38)

          at Foo.<clinit>(ConsoleScript38:3)

          ... 3 more

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            Roshan Dawrani added a comment -

            Fixed

            Show
            Roshan Dawrani added a comment - Fixed
            Hide
            Permalink
            Guillaume Delcroix added a comment -

            The problem is also present in 1.6/1.7?

            Show
            Guillaume Delcroix added a comment - The problem is also present in 1.6/1.7?
            Hide
            Permalink
            Roshan Dawrani added a comment -

            I am not sure I understand the question. it was present on all 3 branches - 1.5.x, 1.6.x and trunk and on all 3 I have fixed and marked so.

            Show
            Roshan Dawrani added a comment - I am not sure I understand the question. it was present on all 3 branches - 1.5.x, 1.6.x and trunk and on all 3 I have fixed and marked so.

              People

              • Assignee:
                Roshan Dawrani
                Reporter:
                Chris Currivan
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Development