Uploaded image for project: 'Giraph (Retired)'
  1. Giraph (Retired)
  2. GIRAPH-788

Giraph job suspends with exceptions when out-of-core options are set

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Open
    • Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • 1.0.0
    • None
    • mapreduce
    • None
    • uses hadoop 0.20.203.0 with 32 cluster nodes
      Giraph release-1.0 pulled Oct. 29. 2013.

    Description

      When I run my code with out-of-core graph/message options OFF, it's fine. But when out-of-core graph/message options ON, then some workers give me exception messages like below and whole tasks suspends.

      java.lang.IllegalStateException: run: Caught an unrecoverable exception waitFor: ExecutionException occurred while waiting for org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils$FutureWaitable@3c7659ab
      	at org.apache.giraph.graph.GraphMapper.run(GraphMapper.java:101)
      	at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:763)
      	at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:369)
      	at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:259)
      	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
      	at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:415)
      	at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1059)
      	at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:253)
      Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: waitFor: ExecutionException occurred while waiting for org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils$FutureWaitable@3c7659ab
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.waitFor(ProgressableUtils.java:181)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.waitForever(ProgressableUtils.java:139)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.waitForever(ProgressableUtils.java:124)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.getFutureResult(ProgressableUtils.java:87)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.getResultsWithNCallables(ProgressableUtils.java:221)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.BspServiceWorker.loadInputSplits(BspServiceWorker.java:283)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.BspServiceWorker.loadVertices(BspServiceWorker.java:327)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.BspServiceWorker.setup(BspServiceWorker.java:508)
      	at org.apache.giraph.graph.GraphTaskManager.execute(GraphTaskManager.java:246)
      	at org.apache.giraph.graph.GraphMapper.run(GraphMapper.java:91)
      	... 7 more
      Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOrCreatePartition: cannot retrieve partition 6
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerGet(FutureTask.java:262)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:119)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils$FutureWaitable.waitFor(ProgressableUtils.java:300)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.ProgressableUtils.waitFor(ProgressableUtils.java:173)
      	... 16 more
      Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOrCreatePartition: cannot retrieve partition 6
      	at org.apache.giraph.partition.DiskBackedPartitionStore.getOrCreatePartition(DiskBackedPartitionStore.java:243)
      	at org.apache.giraph.comm.requests.SendWorkerVerticesRequest.doRequest(SendWorkerVerticesRequest.java:110)
      	at org.apache.giraph.comm.netty.NettyWorkerClientRequestProcessor.doRequest(NettyWorkerClientRequestProcessor.java:482)
      	at org.apache.giraph.comm.netty.NettyWorkerClientRequestProcessor.sendVertexRequest(NettyWorkerClientRequestProcessor.java:276)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.VertexInputSplitsCallable.readInputSplit(VertexInputSplitsCallable.java:172)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.InputSplitsCallable.loadInputSplit(InputSplitsCallable.java:267)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.InputSplitsCallable.call(InputSplitsCallable.java:211)
      	at org.apache.giraph.worker.InputSplitsCallable.call(InputSplitsCallable.java:60)
      	at org.apache.giraph.utils.LogStacktraceCallable.call(LogStacktraceCallable.java:51)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
      	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
      Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerGet(FutureTask.java:252)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:111)
      	at org.apache.giraph.partition.DiskBackedPartitionStore.getOrCreatePartition(DiskBackedPartitionStore.java:228)
      	... 13 more
      Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
      	at org.apache.giraph.partition.DiskBackedPartitionStore$GetPartition.call(DiskBackedPartitionStore.java:692)
      	at org.apache.giraph.partition.DiskBackedPartitionStore$GetPartition.call(DiskBackedPartitionStore.java:658)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
      	at org.apache.giraph.partition.DiskBackedPartitionStore$DirectExecutorService.execute(DiskBackedPartitionStore.java:972)
      	at java.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutorService.submit(AbstractExecutorService.java:132)
      	... 14 more
      

      This exception occurs when superstep = -1.

      Strange things are that i) when I give option to run the job with equal or less than 10 workers, or ii ) when I run one of the example codes in giraph-examples - particularly, SimpleShortestPath with 32 workers, the job finishes fine. The exceptions only occur when I run my own code with larger than 10 workers. Then it goes out of the way.

      I found that there was a similar - yet as far as I know, the very same problem before in GIRAPH-462, but the issue is marked as 'Resolved' and 'Fixed'. Does this issue really fixed and am I just doing wrong?

      My input size was 75 MBytes with about 1 million nodes but I tested and found this problem does not depends on the input sizes.

      Attachments

        1. GIRAPH-788.patch
          0.7 kB
          Alexandre Fonseca

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            byungnam Byungnam Lim
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: