Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Fineract'
  1. Apache Fineract
  2. FINERACT-762

Use of (unmaintained) Drizzle JDBC driver in Fineract at run-time (not build) is sub-optimal for performance

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
    • Component/s: None

      Description

      Creating this issue to clarify that while FINERACT-761 is focused on (only) the build time use of the Drizzle JDBC driver (which does not lead to it being included in the final Fineract end-user distribution), this is re. the use of it at run-time, which is packaged in the distribution.

      The two uses are technically unrelated. While the use of Drizzle instead of Connector/J in the build is a a blocking issue, the use at run-time is not a blocking problem, currently. It's perhaps still not ideal to maintain on a completely unmaintained library (Drizzle) for database access, e.g. for performance.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                vorburger Michael Vorburger
                Reporter:
                vorburger Michael Vorburger
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 1h 10m
                  1h 10m