Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Fineract'
  1. Apache Fineract
  2. FINERACT-762

Use of (unmaintained) Drizzle JDBC driver in Fineract at run-time (not build) is sub-optimal for performance

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.4.0
    • None

    Description

      Creating this issue to clarify that while FINERACT-761 is focused on (only) the build time use of the Drizzle JDBC driver (which does not lead to it being included in the final Fineract end-user distribution), this is re. the use of it at run-time, which is packaged in the distribution.

      The two uses are technically unrelated. While the use of Drizzle instead of Connector/J in the build is a a blocking issue, the use at run-time is not a blocking problem, currently. It's perhaps still not ideal to maintain on a completely unmaintained library (Drizzle) for database access, e.g. for performance.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              vorburger Michael Vorburger
              vorburger Michael Vorburger
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 1h 10m
                  1h 10m