Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.21.0
-
None
Description
When using Drill with parquet files where the timestamp columns are in microseconds, Drill converts the microsecond values to milliseconds when displayed. However, when using a timestamp column in WHERE clauses it looks like the original microsecond value is used instead of the adjusted millisecond value when filtering records.
To Reproduce
Assume a parquet file in a directory "Test" with a column timestampCol having the type org.apache.parquet.schema.OriginalType.TIMESTAMP_MICROS.
Assume there are two records with the values 1673981999806149 and 1674759597743552, respectively, in that column (i.e. the UTC dates 2023-01-17T18:59:59.806149 and 2023-01-26T18:59:57.743552)
- Execute the query
SELECT timestampCol FROM dfs.Test;
The result includes both records, as expected.
- Execute the query
SELECT timestampCol FROM dfs.Test WHERE timestampCol < TO_TIMESTAMP('2023-02-01 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
This produces an empty result although both records have a value less than the argument.
- Execute
SELECT timestampCol FROM dfs.Test WHERE timestampCol > TO_TIMESTAMP('2023-02-01 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
The result includes both records although neither have a value greater than the argument.
Expected behavior
The query in 2) above should produce a result with both records, and the query in 3) should produce an empty result.
Additional context
Even timestamps long into the future produce results with both records, e.g.:
SELECT timestampCol FROM dfs.Test WHERE timestampCol > TO_TIMESTAMP('2502-04-04 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
Manually converting the timestamp column to milliseconds produces the expected result:
SELECT timestampCol FROM dfs.Test WHERE TO_TIMESTAMP(CONVERT_FROM(CONVERT_TO(timestampCol, 'TIMESTAMP_EPOCH'), 'BIGINT')/1000) < TO_TIMESTAMP('2023-02-01 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
produces a result with both records.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
DRILL-8423 Parquet TIME_MICROS columns with values > Integer.MAX_VALUE are not displayed correctly
- Closed