Uploaded image for project: 'MINA'
  1. MINA
  2. DIRMINA-911

Surprising behaviour with ConnectFuture

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Not A Bug
    • 2.0.6
    • 2.0.8
    • Core
    • None
    • Linux 3.5.5 amd64, OpenJDK 6 (IcedTea6 1.11.4) 6.b24_1.11_4-1_x86_64

    Description

      The following server does not appear to receive any of the data sent by the client:

      http://waste.io7m.com/2012/10/07/Server.java
      http://waste.io7m.com/2012/10/07/Client.java

      The output from the client is:

      Connecting
      session-created: (0x00000001: nio datagram, client, /127.0.0.1:33868 => /127.0.0.1:2300)
      Connected
      Session (0x00000001: nio datagram, client, /127.0.0.1:33868 => /127.0.0.1:2300)
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]
      Writing HeapBuffer[pos=0 lim=8 cap=8: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03]

      The output from the server is:

      Binding...
      Bound

      I'd expect to see messages regarding session creation and messages received on the server side.

      Emmanuel Lecharny had this to say:

      > Your code is correct, and, yes, there is something subtile that make
      > your code not working.
      >
      > You have to add :
      >
      > future.awaitUninterruptibly();
      > just after this line in your UDPClient :
      >
      > final ConnectFuture future =
      > this.connector.connect(new InetSocketAddress("127.0.0.1", 2300));
      >
      > Yes, I know, it sounds weirdo. I have no idea why the
      >
      > if (conn_future.isConnected()) {
      >
      > does not wait for the same kind of event than the await() method does.
      >
      > I suggest you fill a JIRA, so that we can fix this strange behavior

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            johnnyv Jonathan Valliere
            io7m Mark Raynsford
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: