Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-6900

docs build for ref.html gives errors about rrefjavstateautogen.dita -- possible typo?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 10.13.1.0
    • Component/s: Documentation
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      When I run 'ant html.ref' in the docs trunk, I get this error:

      [xslt] /extra/derby/docs/trunk/DITA-OT1.1.2.1/xsl/preprocess/topicpull.xsl:327:75: Warning! Can not load requested doc: /extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp/rrefjavstateautogen.dita (No such file or directory)
      [xslt] /extra/derby/docs/trunk/DITA-OT1.1.2.1/xsl/common/output-message.xsl:43:16: Warning! ------------------------------------------------------------------
      [xslt] IDXS059E Error: (File = /extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp_source/ref/refderby.ditamap, Element = topicref:278)
      [xslt] The file file:///extra/derby/docs/trunk/temp/rrefjavstateautogen.dita is
      [xslt] not available to resolve link information. Either the file could not
      [xslt] be found, or a DITAVAL file was used to remove the file's contents.
      [xslt] Be aware that the path information above may not match the link in
      [xslt] your topic.

      Digging into the refderby.ditamap SVN history, it looks to me like the refrence to rrefjavstateautogen.dita was added by revision 1643722,
      as part of DERBY-6753.

      That revision also added a new file named crefjavstateautogen.dita,
      which seems to have a very similar, but not idential, name ('cref*'
      rather than 'rref*').

      I wonder if this is just a typo, and the changes in 1643722 should have
      been referring to crefjavstateautogen.dita, not rrefjavstateautogen.dita.

      Or, possibly, there were supposed to be two new files added by that
      revision (both rref and cref), and the revision ommitted an svn add for
      one of those files?

      More research is needed, but it seems like some follow-up work is
      probably worth doing here.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              bryanpendleton Bryan Pendleton
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: