Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 10.9.1.0
    • Fix Version/s: 10.10.1.1
    • Component/s: Documentation
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.

      However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?

      I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes sense.

      1. derby-6061-chinese.diff
        2 kB
        Dag H. Wanvik
      2. DERBY-6061-2.zip
        7 kB
        Kim Haase
      3. DERBY-6061-3.diff
        7 kB
        Kim Haase
      4. DERBY-6061-code2.stat
        0.2 kB
        Kim Haase
      5. DERBY-6061-code2.diff
        3 kB
        Kim Haase
      6. DERBY-6061-2.diff
        7 kB
        Kim Haase
      7. DERBY-6061.zip
        7 kB
        Kim Haase
      8. DERBY-6061.stat
        0.2 kB
        Kim Haase
      9. cdevcsecureroles.html
        15 kB
        Kim Haase
      10. DERBY-6061-code.diff
        0.7 kB
        Kim Haase
      11. DERBY-6061.diff
        0.7 kB
        Kim Haase

        Activity

          People

          • Assignee:
            Kim Haase
            Reporter:
            Kim Haase
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            8 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development