Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-6061

Upgrade language is inconsistent

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 10.9.1.0
    • Fix Version/s: 10.10.1.1
    • Component/s: Documentation
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.

      However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?

      I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes sense.

        Attachments

        1. DERBY-6061-code2.stat
          0.2 kB
          Kim Haase
        2. DERBY-6061-code2.diff
          3 kB
          Kim Haase
        3. DERBY-6061-code.diff
          0.7 kB
          Kim Haase
        4. derby-6061-chinese.diff
          2 kB
          Dag H. Wanvik
        5. DERBY-6061-3.diff
          7 kB
          Kim Haase
        6. DERBY-6061-2.zip
          7 kB
          Kim Haase
        7. DERBY-6061-2.diff
          7 kB
          Kim Haase
        8. DERBY-6061.zip
          7 kB
          Kim Haase
        9. DERBY-6061.stat
          0.2 kB
          Kim Haase
        10. DERBY-6061.diff
          0.7 kB
          Kim Haase
        11. cdevcsecureroles.html
          15 kB
          Kim Haase

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              chaase3 Kim Haase
              Reporter:
              chaase3 Kim Haase
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: