Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 3.2.1
    • Fix Version/s: 3.2.2, 4.0-alpha1, 4.0
    • Component/s: List
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      I found this bug during my work on issue COLLECTIONS-310 :

      When you 'set' an element to a position that contains this element, it is removed from the internal set. This leads to the situation that

      • invocing get() returns the element
      • invocing contains() returns false.

      Extending the existing test method for set:

         public void testSet() {
              final SetUniqueList<E> lset = new SetUniqueList<E>(new ArrayList<E>(), new HashSet<E>());
      
              // Duplicate element
              final E obj1 = (E) new Integer(1);
              final E obj2 = (E) new Integer(2);
              final E obj3 = (E) new Integer(3);
      
              lset.add(obj1);
              lset.add(obj2);
              lset.set(0, obj1);
              assertEquals(2, lset.size());
              assertSame(obj1, lset.get(0));
              assertSame(obj2, lset.get(1));
      
              assertTrue(lset.contains(obj1));  // fails !
              assertTrue(lset.contains(obj2));
      
      

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                t.vahrst Thomas Vahrst
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: