Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Cordova'
  1. Apache Cordova
  2. CB-7291

Externally-launchable applications should be configurable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Blocker
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 3.5.0
    • Fix Version/s: 3.6.0
    • Component/s: cordova-android
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Cordova Android versions up to 3.5.0 would launch any and all external applications by URL. Any URL not explicitly whitelisted was sent to the Android intent system for handling. This was the cause of the security vulnerabilities reported by IBM and disclosed in CVE-2014-3502.

      Cordova Android 3.5.1 was released to fix this, which it did by disabling explicit intents, and explaining how to use a plugin to block other URL schemes if desired.

      We want to have a better official solution than this, so that developers can easily configure which applications (sms, email, maps, etc) should be launchable from their Cordova app.

      Proposal

      The proposed solution is to maintain a second whitelist within the app, for URL patterns which may be used to launch external applications. Then, on URL loading, these tests will occur (in order):

      1. URLs which are whitelisted internally (existing list) will cause internal navigation
      2. URLs which are whitelisted externally (new list) will attempt to launch an intent to handle it
      3. URLs which are not whitelisted at all (in neither list) will be blocked.

      Configuration

      URLs can be added to the new (external) whitelist through an extension to the config.xml whitelist syntax:

      <access origin="sms:*" launch-external="yes" />
      

      (Any non-empty value for the launch-external attribute will be considered "true" when parsing the config.xml file)

      Open questions (one about forward-thinking security, the other about backwards-compatibility):

      1. What should the default external whitelist be in the application template that we ship? This will be the case for new apps build with 3.6.0.
      2. What should the default external whitelist be when there are no <access launch-external="yes"> tags in config.xml? This will be the case for apps which are upgrading to 3.6.0.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              iclelland Ian Clelland
              Reporter:
              iclelland Ian Clelland
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: