Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.0.0-M5
-
None
-
None
Description
Using filterPermissions, I selected a member (ApplicationUser#permissions, in fact), but what I saw was all the permissions relating to the type (ApplicationUser). What is the intended behaviour here?
Also, with the "sort:X" prefix, a couple of points:
a) the "sort:" is a lot to type.
b) there's no space after those first 6 chars, which is tricky to read.
Perhaps it could be simplified to:
n:<xxxx>
t:<xxxx>
m:<xxxx>
which is less to type, and the ":" acts as a natural separator?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
CAUSEWAY-2701 SecMan: rename ApplicationUser_permissions to ApplicationUser_effectiveMemberPermissions
- Closed