Uploaded image for project: 'Cassandra'
  1. Cassandra
  2. CASSANDRA-7317

Repair range validation is too strict

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Normal
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.0.9
    • None
    • None
    • Normal

    Description

      From what I can tell the calculation (using the -pr option) and validation of tokens for repairing ranges is broken. Or at least should be improved. Using an example with ccm:

      Nodetool ring:

      Datacenter: dc1
      ==========
      Address    Rack        Status State   Load            Owns                Token
                                                                                -10
      127.0.0.1  r1          Up     Normal  188.96 KB       50.00%              -9223372036854775808
      127.0.0.2  r1          Up     Normal  194.77 KB       50.00%              -10
      
      Datacenter: dc2
      ==========
      Address    Rack        Status State   Load            Owns                Token
                                                                                0
      127.0.0.4  r1          Up     Normal  160.58 KB       0.00%               -9223372036854775798
      127.0.0.3  r1          Up     Normal  139.46 KB       0.00%               0
      

      Schema:

      CREATE KEYSPACE system_traces WITH replication = {
        'class': 'NetworkTopologyStrategy',
        'dc2': '2',
        'dc1': '2'
      };
      

      Repair -pr:

      [Nicks-MacBook-Pro:21:35:58 cassandra-2.0] cassandra$ bin/nodetool -p 7100 repair -pr system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:36:01,977] Starting repair command #12, repairing 1 ranges for keyspace system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:36:02,207] Repair session f984d290-e6d9-11e3-9edc-5f8011daec21 for range (0,-9223372036854775808] finished
      [2014-05-28 21:36:02,207] Repair command #12 finished
      [Nicks-MacBook-Pro:21:36:02 cassandra-2.0] cassandra$ bin/nodetool -p 7200 repair -pr system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:36:14,086] Starting repair command #1, repairing 1 ranges for keyspace system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:36:14,406] Repair session 00bd45b0-e6da-11e3-98fc-5f8011daec21 for range (-9223372036854775798,-10] finished
      [2014-05-28 21:36:14,406] Repair command #1 finished
      

      Note that repairing both nodes in dc1, leaves very small ranges unrepaired. For example (-10,0]. Repairing the 'primary range' in dc2 will repair those small ranges. Maybe that is the behavior we want but it seems counterintuitive.

      The behavior when manually trying to repair the full range of 127.0.0.01 definitely needs improvement though.

      Repair command:

      [Nicks-MacBook-Pro:21:50:44 cassandra-2.0] cassandra$ bin/nodetool -p 7100 repair -st -10 -et -9223372036854775808 system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:50:55,803] Starting repair command #17, repairing 1 ranges for keyspace system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:50:55,804] Starting repair command #17, repairing 1 ranges for keyspace system_traces
      [2014-05-28 21:50:55,804] Repair command #17 finished
      [Nicks-MacBook-Pro:21:50:56 cassandra-2.0] cassandra$ echo $?
      1
      

      system.log:

      ERROR [Thread-96] 2014-05-28 21:40:05,921 StorageService.java (line 2621) Repair session failed:
      java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Requested range intersects a local range but is not fully contained in one; this would lead to imprecise repair
      
      • The actual output of the repair command doesn't really indicate that there was an issue. Although the command does return with a non zero exit status.
      • The error here is invisible if you are using the synchronous jmx repair api. It will appear as though the repair completed successfully.
      • Personally, I believe that should be a valid repair command. For the system_traces keyspace, 127.0.0.1 is responsible for this range (and I would argue the 'primary range' of the node).

      Attachments

        1. Untitled Diagram(1).png
          32 kB
          Mikhail Stepura
        2. 7317-2.0.txt
          11 kB
          Yuki Morishita

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              yukim Yuki Morishita
              nickmbailey Nick Bailey
              Yuki Morishita
              Marcus Eriksson
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              13 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: