Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Low
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
Description
We should prioritize compacting CFs by how many reads/s its preferred candidate would save, divided by the number of bytes in the sstables.
(Note that STCS currently divides by number of keys; ISTM that bytes will work better since that does not penalize narrow rows.)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
CASSANDRA-11218 Prioritize Secondary Index rebuild
- Awaiting Feedback