Cassandra
  1. Cassandra
  2. CASSANDRA-3197

Separate input and output connection details in ConfigHelper

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
    • Component/s: Hadoop
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Currently ConfigHelper's getInitialAddress(..) getRpcPort(..) and getPartitioner(..)
      presume CFIF will be using the same cluster as CFOF.

      The latter two are a problem for me as on the same servers i'm running two clusters, one w/ ByteOrderingPartitioner and the other with RP), and i would like to read from the BOP cluster and write to the RP cluster.

        Activity

        Mck SembWever created issue -
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12494215 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197-extra.patch [ 12494217 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Patch Available [ 10002 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.8.6 [ 12317850 ]
        Sylvain Lebresne made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.8.7 [ 12317966 ]
        Fix Version/s 0.8.6 [ 12317850 ]
        Jonathan Ellis made changes -
        Fix Version/s 1.0.0 [ 12316349 ]
        Fix Version/s 0.8.7 [ 12317966 ]
        Affects Version/s 0.7.0 [ 12316026 ]
        Affects Version/s 0.8.5 [ 12317588 ]
        Priority Major [ 3 ] Minor [ 4 ]
        Reviewer brandon.williams
        Jonathan Ellis made changes -
        Fix Version/s 1.1 [ 12317615 ]
        Fix Version/s 1.0.0 [ 12316349 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12501444 ]
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197-extra.patch [ 12501445 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Description Currently ConfigHelper's getInitialAddress(..) getRpcPort(..) and getPartitioner(..)
        presume CFIF will be using the same cluster as CFOF.

        The latter two are a problem for me as on the same servers i'm running two clusters, one w/ ByteOrderingPartitioner and the other with RP), and i would like to read from the BOP cluster and write to the RP cluster.

        getInitialAddress(..) is of little concern to me.
        Currently ConfigHelper's getInitialAddress(..) getRpcPort(..) and getPartitioner(..)
        presume CFIF will be using the same cluster as CFOF.

        The latter two are a problem for me as on the same servers i'm running two clusters, one w/ ByteOrderingPartitioner and the other with RP), and i would like to read from the BOP cluster and write to the RP cluster.
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197-extra.patch [ 12494217 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12494215 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197-extra.patch [ 12501445 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12501444 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12505748 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12505748 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12506117 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12506117 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12506520 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12506520 ]
        Mck SembWever made changes -
        Attachment CASSANDRA-3197.patch [ 12508383 ]
        Brandon Williams made changes -
        Status Patch Available [ 10002 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Brandon Williams made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        Brandon Williams made changes -
        Status Reopened [ 4 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Gavin made changes -
        Workflow no-reopen-closed, patch-avail [ 12632896 ] patch-available, re-open possible [ 12751601 ]
        Gavin made changes -
        Workflow patch-available, re-open possible [ 12751601 ] reopen-resolved, no closed status, patch-avail, testing [ 12757813 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Mck SembWever
            Reporter:
            Mck SembWever
            Reviewer:
            Brandon Williams
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development