Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Normal
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
Correctness - Unrecoverable Corruption / Loss
-
All
-
Description
Node decommission triggers data transfer to other nodes. While this transfer is in progress,
receiving nodes temporarily hold token ranges in a pending state. However, the cleanup process currently doesn't consider these pending ranges when calculating token ownership.
As a consequence, data that is already stored in sstables gets inadvertently cleaned up.
STR:
- Create two node cluster
- Create keyspace with RF=1
- Insert sample data (assert data is available when querying both nodes)
- Start decommission process of node 1
- Start running cleanup in a loop on node 2 until decommission on node 1 finishes
- Verify of all rows are in the cluster - it will fail as the previous step removed some of the rows
It seems that the cleanup process does not take into account the pending ranges, it uses only the local ranges - https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/caad2f24f95b494d05c6b5d86a8d25fbee58d7c2/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/CompactionManager.java#L466.
There are two solutions to the problem.
One would be to change the cleanup process in a way that it start taking pending ranges into account. Even thought it might sound tempting at first it will require involving changes and a lot of testing effort.
Alternatively we could interrupt/prevent the cleanup process from running when any pending range on a node is detected. That sounds like a reasonable alternative to the problem and something that is relatively easy to implement.
The bug has been already fixed in 4.x with CASSANDRA-16418, the goal of this ticket is to backport it to 3.x.
Attachments
Issue Links
- Blocked
-
CASSANDRA-18823 Cleanup behaviour during node decommission caused missing replica
- Resolved
-
CASSANDRA-16418 Unsafe to run nodetool cleanup during bootstrap or decommission
- Resolved
- is related to
-
CASSANDRA-18863 Some tests are depending on each other
- Triage Needed
- Testing discovered
-
CASSANDRA-19363 Weird data loss in 3.11 flakiness during decommission
- Triage Needed
-
CASSANDRA-19364 Data loss during decommission possible due to a delayed and unsynced pending ranges calculation
- Triage Needed
- links to