Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Resolved
-
Normal
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
Operability
-
Normal
-
All
-
None
-
Description
StorageService.getNativeaddress does not account for IPv6 addresses in the case NATIVE_ADDRESS_AND_PORT is not present in gossip state for an endpoint
While upgrading a cluster using IPv6 addresses from 3.0 to 4.0 I noticed the following in logs for upgraded nodes when processing down events for 3.0 nodes that are going down as part of an upgrade:
2022-09-28 20:18:48,244 ERROR [GossipStage:1] org.apache.cassandra.transport.Server - Problem retrieving RPC address for /[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:d9]:7000 java.net.UnknownHostException: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:d9:9042: invalid IPv6 address at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1355) ~[?:?] at java.net.InetAddress.getAllByName(InetAddress.java:1306) ~[?:?] at java.net.InetAddress.getByName(InetAddress.java:1256) ~[?:?] at org.apache.cassandra.locator.InetAddressAndPort.getByNameOverrideDefaults(InetAddressAndPort.java:227) at org.apache.cassandra.locator.InetAddressAndPort.getByName(InetAddressAndPort.java:212) at org.apache.cassandra.transport.Server$EventNotifier.getNativeAddress(Server.java:377) at org.apache.cassandra.transport.Server$EventNotifier.onDown(Server.java:438) at org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.notifyDown(StorageService.java:2651) at org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.onDead(StorageService.java:3516) at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.markDead(Gossiper.java:1347) at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.markAsShutdown(Gossiper.java:590) at org.apache.cassandra.gms.GossipShutdownVerbHandler.doVerb(GossipShutdownVerbHandler.java:39) at org.apache.cassandra.net.InboundSink.lambda$new$0(InboundSink.java:78) at org.apache.cassandra.net.InboundSink.accept(InboundSink.java:97) at org.apache.cassandra.net.InboundSink.accept(InboundSink.java:45) at org.apache.cassandra.net.InboundMessageHandler$ProcessMessage.run(InboundMessageHandler.java:433) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) [?:?] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) [?:?] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) [?:?] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) [?:?] at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30) [netty-all-4.1.58.Final.jar:4.1.58.Final] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) [?:?]
It appears that StorageService.getNativeaddress does not account for the fact that an endpoint may be an IPv6 address, which required brackets when specified with a port:
/** * Return the native address associated with an endpoint as a string. * @param endpoint The endpoint to get rpc address for * @return the native address */ public String getNativeaddress(InetAddressAndPort endpoint, boolean withPort) { if (endpoint.equals(FBUtilities.getBroadcastAddressAndPort())) return FBUtilities.getBroadcastNativeAddressAndPort().getHostAddress(withPort); else if (Gossiper.instance.getEndpointStateForEndpoint(endpoint).getApplicationState(ApplicationState.NATIVE_ADDRESS_AND_PORT) != null) { try { InetAddressAndPort address = InetAddressAndPort.getByName(Gossiper.instance.getEndpointStateForEndpoint(endpoint).getApplicationState(ApplicationState.NATIVE_ADDRESS_AND_PORT).value); return address.getHostAddress(withPort); } catch (UnknownHostException e) { throw new RuntimeException(e); } } else if (Gossiper.instance.getEndpointStateForEndpoint(endpoint).getApplicationState(ApplicationState.RPC_ADDRESS) == null) return endpoint.address.getHostAddress() + ":" + DatabaseDescriptor.getNativeTransportPort(); else return Gossiper.instance.getEndpointStateForEndpoint(endpoint).getApplicationState(ApplicationState.RPC_ADDRESS).value + ":" + DatabaseDescriptor.getNativeTransportPort(); }
In the two final else cases, the endpoint address and port are delimited with a colon. For IPv6 addresses this creates an invalid address (0:0:0:0:0:0:0:d9:9042), IPv6 addresses must be enclosed in brackets (e.g. [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:d9]:9042) per
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2732#section-2
Once a cluster is fully upgraded to 4.0, this error no longer occurs as all endpoints will have NATIVE_ADDRESS_AND_PORT in their gossip state. This only appears to be an issue during a mixed version case, and the impact of this seems low (4.0 nodes miss on down events for 3.0 nodes).
I'll have a proposed PR for this up shortly.
Attachments
Issue Links
- links to