[CASSANDRA-13849] GossipStage blocks because of race in ActiveRepairService

• Type: Bug
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Normal
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 3.0.16, 3.11.2, 4.0-alpha1, 4.0
• Component/s: Cluster/Gossip
• Labels: patch
• Bug Category: Availability - Unavailable
• Severity: Normal
• Assignee: Sergey Lapukhov
• Reporter: Tom van der Woerdt

Authors

Sergey Lapukhov

Reviewers

Blake Eggleston

• Created: 07/Sep/17 08:02
• Updated: 15/May/20 08:05
• Resolved: 09/Nov/17 01:05

Description

Bad luck caused a kernel panic in a cluster, and that took another node with it because GossipStage stopped responding.

I think it's pretty obvious what's happening, here are the relevant excerpts from the stack traces :

"Thread-24004" #393781 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007efca9647400 nid=0xe75c waiting on condition [0x00007efaa47fe000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)
    at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
    - parking to wait for  <0x000000052b63a7e8> (a java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch$Sync)
    at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
    at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
    at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
    at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:277)
    at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.prepareForRepair(ActiveRepairService.java:332)
    - locked <0x00000002e6bc99f0> (a org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService)
    at org.apache.cassandra.repair.RepairRunnable.runMayThrow(RepairRunnable.java:211)
    at org.apache.cassandra.utils.WrappedRunnable.run(WrappedRunnable.java:28)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)                                                                                                           at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory.lambda$threadLocalDeallocator$0(NamedThreadFactory.java:79)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory$$Lambda$3/1498438472.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

"GossipTasks:1" #367 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007efc5e971000 nid=0x700b waiting for monitor entry [0x00007dfb839fe000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
    at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.removeParentRepairSession(ActiveRepairService.java:421)
    - waiting to lock <0x00000002e6bc99f0> (a org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService)
    at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.convict(ActiveRepairService.java:776)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.FailureDetector.interpret(FailureDetector.java:306)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.doStatusCheck(Gossiper.java:775)                                                                                                                at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.access$800(Gossiper.java:67)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper$GossipTask.run(Gossiper.java:187)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.DebuggableScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$UncomplainingRunnable.run(DebuggableScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:118)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
    at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
    at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory.lambda$threadLocalDeallocator$0(NamedThreadFactory.java:79)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory$$Lambda$3/1498438472.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

"GossipStage:1" #320 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007efc5b9f2c00 nid=0x6fcd waiting for monitor entry [0x00007e260186a000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
    at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.removeParentRepairSession(ActiveRepairService.java:421)
    - waiting to lock <0x00000002e6bc99f0> (a org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService)                                                                                          at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.convict(ActiveRepairService.java:776)
    at org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.onRestart(ActiveRepairService.java:744)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.handleMajorStateChange(Gossiper.java:1049)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.applyStateLocally(Gossiper.java:1143)
    at org.apache.cassandra.gms.GossipDigestAck2VerbHandler.doVerb(GossipDigestAck2VerbHandler.java:49)
    at org.apache.cassandra.net.MessageDeliveryTask.run(MessageDeliveryTask.java:67)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory.lambda$threadLocalDeallocator$0(NamedThreadFactory.java:79)
    at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory$$Lambda$3/1498438472.run(Unknown Source)                                                                                       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

iow, org.apache.cassandra.service.ActiveRepairService.prepareForRepair holds a lock until the repair is prepared, which means waiting for other nodes to respond, which may die at exactly that moment, so they won't complete. Gossip will at the same time try to mark the node as down, but it requires that same lock