Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:

      Description

      Since its inception, Cassandra has been utilising SEDA at its core.

      As originally conceived, it means every request is split into several stages, and each stage is backed by a thread pool. That imposes certain challenges:

      • thread parking/unparking overheads (partially improved by SEPExecutor in CASSANDRA-4718)
      • extensive context switching (i-/d- caches thrashing)
      • less than optimal multiple writer/multiple reader data structures for memtables, partitions, metrics, more
      • hard to grok concurrent code
      • large number of GC roots, longer TTSP
      • increased complexity for moving data structures off java heap
      • inability to easily balance writes/reads/compaction/flushing

      Latency implications of SEDA have been acknowledged by the authors themselves - see 2010 retrospective on SEDA.

      To fix these issues (and more), two years ago at NGCC Benedict suggested moving Cassandra away from SEDA to the more mechanically sympathetic thread per core architecture (TPC). See the slides from the original presentation here.

      In a nutshell, each core would become a logical shared nothing micro instance of Cassandra, taking over a portion of the node’s range *.

      Client connections will be assigned randomly to one of the cores (sharing a single listen socket). A request that cannot be served by the client’s core will be proxied to the one owning the data, similar to the way we perform remote coordination today.

      Each thread (pinned to an exclusive core) would have a single event loop, and be responsible for both serving requests and performing maintenance tasks (flushing, compaction, repair), scheduling them intelligently.

      One notable exception from the original proposal is that we cannot, unfortunately, use linux AIO for file I/O, as it's only properly implemented for xfs. We might, however, have a specialised implementation for xfs and Windows (based on IOCP) later. In the meantime, we have no other choice other than to hand off I/O that cannot be served from cache to a separate threadpool.

      Transitioning from SEDA to TPC will be done in stages, incrementally and in parallel.

      This is a high-level overview meta-ticket that will track JIRA issues for each individual stage.

      * they’ll share certain things still, like schema, gossip, file I/O threadpool(s), and maybe MessagingService.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          There are no comments yet on this issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              iamaleksey Aleksey Yeschenko
            • Votes:
              16 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              81 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:

                Development