Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Currently, for queries like this:
select sal from emp where 2 IN (select deptno from dept)
SubQueryRemoveRule rules expand query plan in such a way:
LogicalProject(SAL=[$5]) LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8]) LogicalJoin(condition=[=(2, $9)], joinType=[inner]) LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]]) LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$0]) LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, DEPT]])
Since join condition is actually a filter condition, it will be pushed into the filter during further planning stages and join with the true condition is left.
But these types of the queries may be rewritten in the same way as EXISTS queries:
select sal from emp where EXISTS (select deptno from dept where deptno=2)
with the more optimal plan:
LogicalProject(SAL=[$5]) LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8]) LogicalJoin(condition=[true], joinType=[inner]) LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]]) LogicalAggregate(group=[{0}]) LogicalProject(i=[true]) LogicalFilter(condition=[=($0, 2)]) LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, DEPT]])