Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 0.6.0
    • Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
    • Component/s: RPM
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Here's the list:

      /usr/bin/sqoop
      /usr/lib/sqoop  
      /usr/lib/sqoop/bin
      /usr/lib/hadoop/bin/fuse_dfs 
      /etc/default/hadoop-fuse
      

        Activity

        Hide
        Sean Mackrory added a comment -

        I have been looking at this with regards to Sqoop (specifically, the contents of /usr/lib/sqoop and its subdirectories). I'm not sure I have a good solution for this that still allows us to keep the -client package as minimal as possible, but if you have any ideas I'd be happy to spend the time to patch this. I'm surprised about /usr/bin/sqoop, though - I only see it in the sqoop-client package. Where else is it showing up?

        Other than just being bad style and the potential for confusion and related bugs, are there any consequences of this? I know that the /usr/lib/sqoop issue causes that directory to remain (empty) after removing the packages, but I see that as a minor annoyance that would be nice to fix if / when we come up with a good way to split those packages better. Just wandering if this is connected to any more serious issues as well.

        Show
        Sean Mackrory added a comment - I have been looking at this with regards to Sqoop (specifically, the contents of /usr/lib/sqoop and its subdirectories). I'm not sure I have a good solution for this that still allows us to keep the -client package as minimal as possible, but if you have any ideas I'd be happy to spend the time to patch this. I'm surprised about /usr/bin/sqoop, though - I only see it in the sqoop-client package. Where else is it showing up? Other than just being bad style and the potential for confusion and related bugs, are there any consequences of this? I know that the /usr/lib/sqoop issue causes that directory to remain (empty) after removing the packages, but I see that as a minor annoyance that would be nice to fix if / when we come up with a good way to split those packages better. Just wandering if this is connected to any more serious issues as well.
        Hide
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment -

        Well, it does show up in our Package tests and I'd rather fix the underlying issue than kludge the test logic (even though I agree it is NOT a catastrophic problem).

        I think I've got a fix for fuse stuff, as for sqoop – lets look into it some more.

        Show
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment - Well, it does show up in our Package tests and I'd rather fix the underlying issue than kludge the test logic (even though I agree it is NOT a catastrophic problem). I think I've got a fix for fuse stuff, as for sqoop – lets look into it some more.
        Hide
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment -

        Ok, so sqoop ended up being test being staled – false alarm there, but hadoop-hdfs-fuse is the real deal.

        Patch attached.

        Show
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment - Ok, so sqoop ended up being test being staled – false alarm there, but hadoop-hdfs-fuse is the real deal. Patch attached.
        Hide
        Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

        +1 - looks good

        Show
        Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - +1 - looks good
        Hide
        Peter Linnell added a comment -

        +1 LGTM

        Show
        Peter Linnell added a comment - +1 LGTM

          People

          • Assignee:
            Roman Shaposhnik
            Reporter:
            Roman Shaposhnik
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development