Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.0.0
    • Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
    • Component/s: hadoop
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      YARN-2815 (included in hadoop-2.7) blocks BIGTOP-1701 (upgrade to hive-1.1.0) since incompatible jline Libraries in hadoop-2.6 and hive-1.1.0 are being used.

      1. BIGTOP-1805.1.patch
        2 kB
        Olaf Flebbe
      2. BIGTOP-1805.2.patch
        2 kB
        Olaf Flebbe

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment -

          SInce hadoop 2.7 is required by Hive 1.1.0 I suspect Hive 1.2.0 to requires it too.

          Show
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - SInce hadoop 2.7 is required by Hive 1.1.0 I suspect Hive 1.2.0 to requires it too.
          Hide
          evans_ye Evans Ye added a comment -

          I see the release note said:

          While Hadoop 2.7.0 is not yet ready for production.

          Thus I guess we should skip one for Bigtop.

          Show
          evans_ye Evans Ye added a comment - I see the release note said: While Hadoop 2.7.0 is not yet ready for production. Thus I guess we should skip one for Bigtop.
          Hide
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment -

          I see 2.7.1 is now considered stable.

          Show
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - I see 2.7.1 is now considered stable.
          Hide
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment -

          Any Workaround on ignite has to be backed up first ...

          Show
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - Any Workaround on ignite has to be backed up first ...
          Hide
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

          Wait - it is stable but the source code won't compile without your patch? In which world that can be considered stable? I guess there's special Hadoop world where such semantics work.

          Show
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - Wait - it is stable but the source code won't compile without your patch? In which world that can be considered stable? I guess there's special Hadoop world where such semantics work.
          Hide
          warwithin YoungWoo Kim added a comment -

          +1

          Show
          warwithin YoungWoo Kim added a comment - +1
          Hide
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

          It really saddens me that we have to resort to the in-place patching of the official apache releases because of their low quality.

          Show
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - It really saddens me that we have to resort to the in-place patching of the official apache releases because of their low quality.
          Hide
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment -

          Konstantin Boudnik: You may have missread the patch. I am actually removing a patch from bigtop, since upstream has fixed the issue.

          I am citing the release notes "A point release for the 2.7 line. This release is now considered stable. " BTW: The biologist wording for "stable" is "dead"

          appling to master... Thanks YoungWoo Kim for review!

          Show
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - Konstantin Boudnik : You may have missread the patch. I am actually removing a patch from bigtop, since upstream has fixed the issue. I am citing the release notes "A point release for the 2.7 line. This release is now considered stable. " BTW: The biologist wording for "stable" is "dead" appling to master... Thanks YoungWoo Kim for review!
          Hide
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - - edited

          Oops the comment in the patch was incorrect... I fixed it

          Show
          oflebbe Olaf Flebbe added a comment - - edited Oops the comment in the patch was incorrect... I fixed it
          Hide
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

          You may have missread the patch. I am actually removing a patch from bigtop, since upstream has fixed the issue.

          Oh, that's right - I misread it indeed. Thanks for clarifying.

          Show
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - You may have missread the patch. I am actually removing a patch from bigtop, since upstream has fixed the issue. Oh, that's right - I misread it indeed. Thanks for clarifying.
          Hide
          tomzeng Tom Zeng added a comment -

          FYI - This patch does not work with the latest master branch anymore due to the bigtop.mk to bigtop.bom change.

          Show
          tomzeng Tom Zeng added a comment - FYI - This patch does not work with the latest master branch anymore due to the bigtop.mk to bigtop.bom change.
          Hide
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

          Tom Zeng I am not sure about your comment. Olaf Flebbe pushed that it; then I have resolved the conflict on BIGTOP-1494 and pushed it in. Since that moment this patch will be invalid, but it doesn't matter because it has been already on the master.

          Show
          cos Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - Tom Zeng I am not sure about your comment. Olaf Flebbe pushed that it; then I have resolved the conflict on BIGTOP-1494 and pushed it in. Since that moment this patch will be invalid, but it doesn't matter because it has been already on the master.

            People

            • Assignee:
              oflebbe Olaf Flebbe
              Reporter:
              oflebbe Olaf Flebbe
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development