[BEAM-2067] Add support for generic CoderProvider -> CoderFactory mapping with CoderRegistrar

• Type: Improvement
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: P2
• Resolution: Duplicate
• Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
• Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
• Component/s: io-java-gcp
• Assignee: Luke Cwik
• Reporter: Luke Cwik
• Created: 24/Apr/17 22:02
• Updated: 16/May/20 13:45
• Resolved: 05/May/17 03:09

Description

Instead of relying on Class<?> to CoderFactory in the CoderRegistrar, we should really ask if CoderFactory can handle a specific type or allow for CoderProvider be able answer on its behalf.

This includes re-adding support for ProtoCoder as a "fallback" coder provider.