Uploaded image for project: 'Batik'
  1. Batik
  2. BATIK-764

DOCTYPE tag seems to be obligatory since 1.7beta1

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • 1.7
    • None
    • SVG Viewer
    • None
    • Operating System: other
      Platform: Other

    Description

      1.6 allowed for svg files without <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC ...>, but 1.7beta1 does
      not. As other programs do allow for such files, batik 1.7 should not make an
      exception.

      A quote from http://wiki.svg.org/Doctype says:

      Some people recommend that you do not use a DOCTYPE declaration in your SVG
      files since they consider them to cause more problems than they solve.

      So this implies optional use of the DOCTYPE declaration.

      Error message:
      Root element namespace does not match that requested:
      Requested: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg
      Found: null

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Batik Developer's Mailing list
            mack@ifis.cs.tu-bs.de Thomas Mack
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: