Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
SunOS 5.8 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14
SunOS 5.9 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14
SunOS 5.9 i86pc & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-02 2006/03/31
SunOS 5.10 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-02 2006/03/29
SunOS 5.10 i86pc & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-02 2006/03/31
redhat-3as-ia32 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
redhat-el4-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
redhat-3fc-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
redhat-fc4-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
redhat-fc5-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)SunOS 5.8 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14 SunOS 5.9 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-18 2005/06/14 SunOS 5.9 i86pc & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-02 2006/03/31 SunOS 5.10 sun4u & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-02 2006/03/29 SunOS 5.10 i86pc & cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-02 2006/03/31 redhat-3as-ia32 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) redhat-el4-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) redhat-3fc-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) redhat-fc4-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) redhat-fc5-i386 & gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
Description
Compilers that aren't gcc don't support GCCs extensions for varadic macros; but C99 has support for them.
The attached patch does not cause a regression for RedHat platforms, but does fix a compile error for the solaris platforms. It may even work for other platforms as well.
It is possible that the WIN32 clause could be safely removed with a suitable (and different) test along the lines of
#ifdef _STDC_ && __STDC_VERSION >= 199901L
but I don't have a pet windows sytem to test with.