ActiveMQ Apollo
  1. ActiveMQ Apollo
  2. APLO-206

Load balance of job queues when 'credit:1,0' is used on the consumer.

    Details

      Description

      I wish to have load balanced job queues, like in ActiveMQ (copied and pasted):

      "A queue implements load balancer semantics. A single message will be received by exactly one consumer. If there are no consumers available at the time the message is sent it will be kept until a consumer is available that can process the message. If a consumer receives a message and does not acknowledge it before closing then the message will be redelivered to another consumer. A queue can have many consumers with messages load balanced across the available consumers."

      For example, suppose that I send tree jobs (j1, j2, j3) to a queue with 2 consumers (c1,c2).
      The first job takes 10 seconds to complete, jobs 2 and 3 takes only 1 second.
      Consumers are using 'client' ack, with credit:1,0 in order to receive only one job at the time.
      The desired behaviour of consumers is:

      [ 21:30:00 ][ c1 ] Got job 1
      [ 21:30:00 ][ c2 ] Got job 2
      [ 21:30:01 ][ c2 ] Ack job 2, now idle
      [ 21:30:01 ][ c2 ] Got job 3
      [ 21:30:02 ][ c2 ] Ack job 3, now idle
      [ 21:30:10 ][ c1 ] Ack job 1, now idle

      But currently, Apollo does:

      [ 21:30:00 ][ c1 ] Got job 1
      [ 21:30:00 ][ c2 ] Got job 2
      [ 21:30:01 ][ c2 ] Ack job 2, now idle c2 is idle but does not gets job 3
      [ 21:30:10 ][ c1 ] Ack job 1, now idle
      [ 21:30:10 ][ c1 ] Got job 3
      [ 21:30:11 ][ c1 ] Ack job 3, now idle

      Seems that jobs are assigned in a round-robin fashion at the moment of being received by the broker.
      If in this example I send 9 jobs of 1 second (instead of 2), consumer #1 gets 5 and consumer #2 gets the remaining 5, when the optimum would be to send the 9 fast jobs to consumer #2 while consumer #1 is processing the slow one. I know that using 'client' ack with credit:1,0 is suboptimal from broker perspective, but is the optimal way to balance jobs between workers.

      Besides the underutilization of resources, the main problem is that if a consumer takes too much time to process a job (say, due to a DB lock) it may block the processing of a bunch of jobs already assigned to it.

      ...

      BTW, impressive piece of work!!! I really impressed by the completeness of features, and how well Apollo behaved when I overloaded it with stress tests

        Activity

        No work has yet been logged on this issue.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Hiram Chirino
            Reporter:
            José Micó
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development