Uploaded image for project: 'Traffic Server'
  1. Traffic Server
  2. TS-1385

generic atomic operations API

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 3.3.0
    • 3.3.0
    • Core
    • None

    Description

      Rather than ink_atomic_increment32(), ink_atomic_increment64() and friends we should just have a generic ink_atomic_increment() that works for all the types we do atomic ops on. This is more reliable is cases where the size of a type varies between different systems (eg. time_t).

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            jamespeach James Peach
            jamespeach James Peach
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: