Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Resolved
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
7.5
-
None
Description
In the "facet-trace" debug output for the JSON facets the "processor" field current shows the class name of the FacetRequest implementation (e.g. FacetField, FacetQuery, FacetRange, etc.). It seems like this would be more useful if it showed the FacetProcessor class being used instead (e.g. FacetFieldProcessorByArrayDV, FacetFieldProcessorByHashDV, FacetQueryProcessor, FacetRangeProcessor, etc.)
Example of how it works today:
"debug": { "facet-trace": { "processor": FacetQuery "elapse": 50 "query": null "domainSize": 3296 "sub-facet": [{ processor = FacetField, elapse = 18, field = partTypeId, limit = -1, domainSize = 3296, numBuckets = 392 }, { processor = FacetField, elapse = 25, field = browseNodeId, limit = -1, domainSize = 3296, numBuckets = 535 }] } }
This is what showing the FacetProcessor class name would show:
"debug": { "facet-trace": { "processor": FacetQueryProcessor "elapse": 77 "query": null "domainSize": 3442 "sub-facet": [{ processor = FacetFieldProcessorByHashDV, elapse = 3, field = partTypeId, limit = -1, domainSize = 3442, numBuckets = 407 }, { processor = FacetFieldProcessorByHashDV, elapse = 4, field = browseNodeId, limit = -1, domainSize = 3442, numBuckets = 553 }] } }
Alternatively an additional debug field could be added with this information.