Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Blocker
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
New
Description
If you have a 3.x index, and you open it with a 4.x IndexWriter for
the first time, and you do something that kicks of merges while
concurrently committing, it's possible the index will corrupt itself
with exceptions like this:
java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: /l/tmp/reruns.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.testMergeDuringUpgrade.t2/lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x-71F31CCCEF6853A-001/manysegments.362-006/_0.si at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.translateToIOException(UnixException.java:86) at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:102) at sun.nio.fs.UnixException.rethrowAsIOException(UnixException.java:107) at sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider.newFileChannel(UnixFileSystemProvider.java:177) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:287) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.open(FileChannel.java:334) at org.apache.lucene.store.NIOFSDirectory.openInput(NIOFSDirectory.java:81) at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:80) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene3x.Lucene3xSegmentInfoReader.read(Lucene3xSegmentInfoReader.java:106) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:358) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:454) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:906) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:752) at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:457) at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:414) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestUtil.checkIndex(TestUtil.java:207) at org.apache.lucene.util.TestUtil.checkIndex(TestUtil.java:196) at org.apache.lucene.store.BaseDirectoryWrapper.close(BaseDirectoryWrapper.java:45) at org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.testMergeDuringUpgrade(TestBackwardsCompatibility3x.java:1035)
Back compat tests in Elasticsearch hit this, and at first I thought maybe LUCENE-6279 was the cause (I still think we should fix that) but after further debugging there is a different concurrency bug lurking here.
I have a test case which after substantial beasting is able to reproduce the bug, but I don't yet have a fix. I think IW is missing a checkpoint after writing a new commit...