Uploaded image for project: 'Lucene - Core'
  1. Lucene - Core
  2. LUCENE-2668

offset gap should be added regardless of existence of tokens in DocInverterPerField

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.9.3, 3.0.2, 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
    • 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
    • core/index
    • None
    • New

    Description

      Problem: If a multiValued field which contains a stop word (e.g. "will" in the following sample) only value is analyzed by StopAnalyzer when indexing, the offsets of the subsequent tokens are not correct.

      indexing a multiValued field
      doc.add( new Field( F, "Mike", Store.YES, Index.ANALYZED, TermVector.WITH_OFFSETS ) );
      doc.add( new Field( F, "will", Store.YES, Index.ANALYZED, TermVector.WITH_OFFSETS ) );
      doc.add( new Field( F, "use", Store.YES, Index.ANALYZED, TermVector.WITH_OFFSETS ) );
      doc.add( new Field( F, "Lucene", Store.YES, Index.ANALYZED, TermVector.WITH_OFFSETS ) );
      

      In this program (soon to be attached), if you use WhitespaceAnalyzer, you'll get the offset(start,end) for "use" and "Lucene" will be use(10,13) and Lucene(14,20). But if you use StopAnalyzer, the offsets will be use(9,12) and lucene(13,19). When searching, since searcher cannot know what analyzer was used at indexing time, this problem causes out of alignment of FVH.

      Cause of the problem: StopAnalyzer filters out "will", anyToken flag set to false then offset gap is not added in DocInverterPerField:

      DocInverterPerField.java
      if (anyToken)
        fieldState.offset += docState.analyzer.getOffsetGap(field);
      

      I don't understand why the condition is there... If always the gap is added, I think things are simple.

      Attachments

        1. LUCENE-2668.patch
          13 kB
          Koji Sekiguchi
        2. LUCENE-2668.patch
          11 kB
          Koji Sekiguchi
        3. LUCENE-2668.patch
          1 kB
          Koji Sekiguchi
        4. Test.java
          3 kB
          Koji Sekiguchi

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              koji Koji Sekiguchi
              koji Koji Sekiguchi
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: