Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.9, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
-
None
-
None
-
New
Description
There is confusion about these current Field options and I think we
should rename them, deprecating the old names in 2.4/2.9 and removing
them in 3.0. How about this:
TOKENIZED --> ANALYZED UN_TOKENIZED --> NOT_ANALYZED NO_NORMS --> NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS
Should we also add ANALYZED_NO_NORMS?
Spinoff from here:
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
LUCENE-4369 StringFields name is unintuitive and not helpful
- Open