Uploaded image for project: 'Lucene - Core'
  1. Lucene - Core
  2. LUCENE-10113

Use VarHandles to access int/long/short types in byte arrays (e.g. ByteArrayDataInput)

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 9.0
    • 9.0
    • core/store
    • None
    • New

    Description

      LUCENE-10112 reminded me about something i wanted to do long ago: Basically for all IndexInputs/DataInputs we are able to natively read short, int, long using little endian with single CPU instructions (due to using ByteBuffer's methods that support primitive reads). Only ByteArrayDataInput still uses manual code beased on the the inherited byte-by-byte approach to read single bytes and combining the bytes using little endian.

      The approach here is to use Java 9+ VarHandles to allow reading int/long/short as single cpu instructions and not manually recombining the bytes. The trick is to make a "view" var handle which allows to access the byte array using the same mechanisms as ByteBuffers or JDK 17 MemorySegments (under the hood it uses Unsafe to use CPU instructions and optionally swap bytes if platform endianness is BE).

      In LUCENE-10112 there were similar stuff done with LZ4 and a microbenchmark was written that showed a significant speed improvement when accessing the types with VarHandle.

      P.S.: The same applies to FST.BytesReader and/or ByteSliceReader, but I am no sure if those use the int/short/long ones at all. At least this one does not override the methods to read ints, longs and shorts, so there is no optimization at all. FST seems to read bytes and byte[] only and ByteSliceReader mostly VInts.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              uschindler Uwe Schindler
              uschindler Uwe Schindler
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 5h 10m
                  5h 10m