Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-19749

Revisit logic of UserScanQueryMatcher#mergeFilterResponse method

Log workAgile BoardRank to TopRank to BottomAttach filesAttach ScreenshotBulk Copy AttachmentsBulk Move AttachmentsVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskConvert to sub-taskMoveLinkCloneLabelsUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.0.0-beta-1
    • 2.0.0-beta-1, 2.0.0
    • None
    • None
    • Reviewed

    Description

      As HBASE-19729 comment , there are following points to be optimized:

      1. when the number of cells exceed max version in scan, we should return SEEK_NEXT_COL match code, but if current code is INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW, we can optimize to choose the max step between SEEK_NEXT_COL and INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW, which is SEEK_NEXT_ROW
      2. check to call ColumnTracker#doneWithColumn() only when we change the match code to SEEK_NEXT_COL or INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_COL because of filterResponse.
      3. More UT for those edge case..

      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19729?focusedCommentId=16318131&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16318131

      Attachments

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            openinx Zheng Hu Assign to me
            openinx Zheng Hu
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment