Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: DERBY-41
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Minor Minor
Assignee: Jean T. Anderson
Reporter: Susan Cline
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Derby

Documentation Error - Developer's Guide - 'C' index

Created: 12/Oct/04 09:47 PM   Updated: 06/Jun/05 01:21 AM
Return to search
Component/s: Documentation
Affects Version/s: 10.0.2.0
Fix Version/s: 10.0.2.1

Time Tracking:
Not Specified

Environment: n/a

Resolution Date: 10/Nov/04 05:00 AM


 Description  « Hide
In the index of the derby developer's guide, under the 'C's.

There is a reference to:

com.ibm.derby.database.UserUtility

it needs to be placed in the index for the 'D's and corrected to be:

org.apache.derby.database.UserUtility

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History   Subversion Commits      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Jean T. Anderson added a comment - 08/Nov/04 10:55 PM
The files affected are src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/develop/develop109.ihtml,develop157.ihtml

For now I propose changing the com.ibm to org.apache, but won't attempt to correct the alphabetization of the indexes. Getting indexes correctly alphabetized in the long-term probably fits best into the Derby documentation work referenced at http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=derby-dev@db.apache.org&by=thread&from=897631&to=897631&first=1&count=15
.

Jean T. Anderson added a comment - 10/Nov/04 05:00 AM
Fixed in svn revision 56996:
incubator/derby/site/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/develop/develop109.ihtml incubator/derby/site/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/develop/develop157.ihtml
incubator/derby/site/trunk/build/site/manuals/develop/develop157.html

(incubator/derby/site/trunk/build/site/manuals/develop/develop109.html did not change because the correction was to a meta tag in the source doc.)

scott hutinger added a comment - 04/May/05 11:04 AM
I think it should be under UserUtility, Can we clean a bit of this up, I wouldn't look under C's, or D's, but look for the Final .name. Possibly a listing under Database, derby ?

Possibly we should transform all documents and get a word count listing and sort through everything to see what should be where?

The point; I think some of these document jira's should be gone through with old dates on them, and figure out if the current DITA docs meet the problem(?)

Jean T. Anderson added a comment - 06/Jun/05 01:19 AM
Setting fix version.

Jean T. Anderson added a comment - 06/Jun/05 01:21 AM
Issues with the composition of the index in the originally contributed html docs do not apply to the DITA docs, which have a different mechanism to produce indexes.