Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-2256

Wrong Results: Use of decimal values in an IN-list with INTEGER left operand can lead to extra rows.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2, 10.1.1.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.1.3.2, 10.1.3.3, 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.2.2.1, 10.3.1.4
    • 10.3.1.4
    • SQL
    • None
    • Release Note Needed

    Description

      While trying out some code changes for DERBY-47 I was running a few test cases and happened to notice that there are a couple of cases in which Derby behaves incorrectly (that or my understanding of what should be happening here is way off).

      First and most simply: the following query should return zero rows (unless I'm missing something?), but it returns one:

      ij> create table t1 (i int);
      0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
      ij> insert into t1 values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5;
      5 rows inserted/updated/deleted

      – Correct returns zero rows.
      ij> select * from t1 where i in (4.23);
      I
      -----------

      0 rows selected

      – But this one returns 1 row...
      ij> select * from t1 where i in (2.8, 4.23);
      I
      -----------
      4

      1 row selected

      Secondly, if the IN-list contains a non-constant value then Derby can incorrectly return rows that do not match the IN predicate. I think this is because some internal casting is happening when it shouldn't?

      ij> create table t1 (i int);
      0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
      ij> insert into t1 values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5;
      5 rows inserted/updated/deleted

      – Following values clause returns "2.80", as expected.
      ij> values cast (2.8 as decimal(4, 2));
      1
      -------
      2.80

      1 row selected

      – But if we use it in an IN-list it gets cast to "2" and thus returns a match.
      – We get 2 rows when we should get NONE.
      ij> select * from t1 where i in (cast (2.8 as decimal(4, 2)), 4.23);
      I
      -----------
      2
      4

      2 rows selected

      I confirmed that we see these results on trunk, 10.2, 10.1, and even as far back as svn #201660 for 10.0. I also ran the above statements on DB2 v8 as a sanity check to confirm that NO results were returned there.

      Attachments

        1. d2256_v1.patch
          9 kB
          A B
        2. d2256_v1.stat
          0.4 kB
          A B
        3. releaseNote.html
          4 kB
          A B
        4. releaseNote.html
          4 kB
          A B
        5. releaseNote.html
          4 kB
          Myrna van Lunteren

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              army A B
              army A B
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: