Bug 5502 - [review] RFE: Add a template tag to display the autolearn score
Summary: [review] RFE: Add a template tag to display the autolearn score
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Spamassassin
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Learner (show other bugs)
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: Other other
: P5 enhancement
Target Milestone: 3.2.1
Assignee: SpamAssassin Developer Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard: go
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-07 02:29 UTC by Sidney Markowitz
Modified: 2007-06-07 12:47 UTC (History)
0 users


Attachment Type Modified Status Actions Submitter/CLA Status
Proposed patch to add _AUTOLEARNSCORE_ tag patch None Sidney Markowitz [HasCLA]
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sidney Markowitz 2007-06-07 02:29:04 UTC 
It's been pointed out that it is difficult to figure out how to set autolearn
thresholds because there is no convenient way to see what scores the
autolearning is based on. If we add a template tag that displays the autolearn
score, that would help.
Comment 1 Sidney Markowitz 2007-06-07 02:50:58 UTC 
Created attachment 3975 [details]
Proposed patch to add _AUTOLEARNSCORE_ tag

Here is a patch that implements the suggestion
Comment 2 Sidney Markowitz 2007-06-07 03:34:00 UTC 
I would like to propose that we stick this in the 3.2 branch in time for 3.2.1
so that people trying to deal with the autolearn issues being discussed in bug
5497 can have a fighting chance to figure out what to set their thresholds to.
Without this they will have a hard time adjusting the autolearn thresholds
properly for their environment.

Votes?
Comment 3 Sidney Markowitz 2007-06-07 03:43:05 UTC 
Committed to trunk revision 545143.

I'm putting this on the 3.2.1 queue and labeling it for review and votes, but
that's just to make sure it isn't lost while I put forth the question about how
people feel about getting this into the 3.2.1 release. Devs, what do you think?
Comment 4 Justin Mason 2007-06-07 03:58:57 UTC 
+1 sure, it's trivial
Comment 5 Daryl C. W. O'Shea 2007-06-07 12:19:15 UTC 
+1
Comment 6 Sidney Markowitz 2007-06-07 12:47:02 UTC 
Committed to branch 3.2 revision 545279.