Details
Description
I have a set of mappings that I loaded into a java.util.Properties object that
I need to use in my template rendering. For some reason you have this Context
interface which is little more than a renamed java.util.Map. Why do you have
your own separate implementations for what should just be standard collections
classes? In order to make those properties available, I end up having to create
a context and copy the settings from the Properties object one, by, one. Why
not just use Map instead of Context?