Issue 83413 - resuscitate the arm oabi port
Summary: resuscitate the arm oabi port
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m235
Hardware: All Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.4
Assignee: hjs
QA Contact: issues@porting
URL:
Keywords:
: 81123 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 83775
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-11-07 13:25 UTC by caolanm
Modified: 2007-12-21 14:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
arm oabi patch (70.59 KB, patch)
2007-11-07 16:53 UTC, caolanm 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description caolanm 2007-11-07 13:25:12 UTC 
There was an arm port of OOo, this task is to update it and remerge it into OOo
and add support for hardware floating point,
Comment 1 caolanm 2007-11-07 13:26:02 UTC 
I have the port from 1.1.5 to SRC680_m235 working on my local qemu instance for
the oabi arm.
Comment 2 caolanm 2007-11-07 13:30:39 UTC 
cmc->rene: you might be casually interested in this. The only problem is that
while the two javac/java solutions of ecj/sablevm or gij under arm oabi are
sufficient to *build* OOo they not sufficient to *run* dlopened java bits
without the jvm crashing, so we can get a functional build with java enabled and
with scp2 solely built with java disabled to show that OOo itself is ported to arm
Comment 3 caolanm 2007-11-07 16:53:42 UTC 
Created attachment 49498 [details]
arm oabi patch
Comment 4 caolanm 2007-11-09 10:24:43 UTC 
works, committed to armoabiport01
Comment 5 caolanm 2007-11-15 17:30:25 UTC 
I hate to continuously impose on your as a qa representative, but could you do
the honours ? It's 98% uno bridge, and a tiny little fix in xmlhelp to
unsigned/signed arithmetic.
Comment 6 hjs 2007-11-23 12:04:05 UTC 
can't verify that it does anything usefull on arm but can confirm that it won't
hurt elsewhere.
Comment 7 caolanm 2007-12-03 16:33:06 UTC 
seen in master
Comment 8 ab 2007-12-21 14:02:31 UTC 
*** Issue 81123 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***