Issue 23944 - please restore old issueZilla-help pages for priority of an issue
Summary: please restore old issueZilla-help pages for priority of an issue
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Bugzilla (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-29 15:43 UTC by lohmaier
Modified: 2004-08-31 19:38 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lohmaier 2003-12-29 15:43:07 UTC 
Before the upgrade a klik on the "Priority" link  of an issue brought up the
page describing the Priorities (P1 - severe issues, data loss, etc - P2 severe
issues, no easy workaround, P3 -standard issues, P4 - minor problems, fixing
less important than release-in time, P5 - very minor issues, developer decides
it it is worth a fix)
now, the link just says:

        * P1 - Most important
        * P2
        * P3
        * P4
        * P5 - Least important

Which is not as useful for QA-team as the old explanations.
Comment 1 stx123 2003-12-29 15:52:21 UTC 
We would have to replace ddIssues_EnterModify.html.
But has somebody the old text?
Comment 2 lohmaier 2003-12-30 18:09:16 UTC 
http://qa.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=541 

should contain the definitions/the old text
Comment 3 lsuarezpotts 2004-01-06 00:07:35 UTC 
I'll coordinate with CN on this.
Please keep in mind that this will constitute a one-off, in all likelihood, and so should be tracked as 
such.
louis
Comment 4 lohmaier 2004-01-06 00:51:01 UTC 
? why should improving issuezilla's documentations should be a one-time thing?
I understand your comment as "ok, this time we will try to make this change, but
no changes any more in future"
Thanky anyway..
Comment 5 stx123 2004-01-06 09:32:34 UTC 
Hi, it's a question of maintenance. Non-standard changes/customizations to
SourceCast are called one-offs. We are likely to forget/loose them with the next
update - as we lost the changes with the migration to SC26.
This is why we would like to avoid them.
Comment 6 lohmaier 2004-01-06 18:22:05 UTC 
Thank you for clarifying this.
Comment 7 lsuarezpotts 2004-01-06 21:57:40 UTC 
filed PCN 25117.  Reassigning to support for tracking.
thanks
Louis
Comment 8 testusermohan 2004-02-03 06:06:38 UTC 
Still on Engineers Queue.Have queried the Engineers.
Will Post the Response.

-Mohan
Comment 9 Unknown 2004-04-05 09:41:54 UTC 
Update : Still on Engineers Queuse. Haver queried them for a response
Comment 10 Unknown 2004-04-05 09:44:55 UTC 
Update : still on Engineers Queue; Have Queried them for a response

Next Update : Will update as soon as a response is received

-Mohan
Comment 11 Unknown 2004-04-15 21:36:26 UTC 
I just got confirmation from engineering that this has been fixed.
I went into a test project & went to submit an issue.
I then see the priority link on the left.
I selected that link & it came up with the priority descriptions.
Closing as verified. Please re-open if need be.
Thanks,
Eric
Comment 12 lohmaier 2004-04-17 22:02:12 UTC 
verified, although the indentation is not optimal...
Comment 13 Unknown 2004-08-31 19:38:53 UTC 
Closing this issue.