Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
0.8
-
None
Description
Hi Rahul,
sorry - it's me again ...
The current SCXML draft http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#parallel
allows me to use transitions as an child of parallel-element.
If I try this, the SCXML implemention ignores this transition.
Maybe also a little bug ?
Please refer to the patch attached to this bug (-:
Regards
Danny
-
-
-
- Start engagingTest()
go now
WARN - Ignoring element <transition> in namespace "http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" at null:6:52 and digester match "scxml/parallel/transition"
INFO - /running
INFO - /running/state1
INFO - /running/state2
PASSED: engagingTest
- Start engagingTest()
-
-
Rahul said:
> Yes, in as much as not being implemented is a bug This is another
> addition in the latest Working Draft which we haven't gotten to yet.
>
> Can you open an improvement in JIRA? Please attach the smallest test
> case (test SCXML documents are good, but if you can attach a complete
> JUnit test case that'd be even better – see the src/test tree for
> existing tests for the codebase, you could name this one
> transitions-05.xml and place it here [1], for example).