Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-21520

TestMultiColumnScanner cost long time when using ROWCOL bloom type

VotersStop watchingWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Reviewed

    Description

      The TestMultiColumnScanner is easy to be timeout, you can see HBASE-21517. In my localhost, when I set the parameters to be

      { Compression.Algorithm.NONE, BloomType.ROW, false }

      , it took about 5 seconds. but if I set the parameters to be

      { Compression.Algorithm.NONE, BloomType.ROWCOL, false }

      , it would take about 45 seconds, which means ROWCOL cost much more time than ROW.

      Need to find out what's wrong with this ut.

      Attachments

        1. HBASE-21520.branch-1.v4.patch
          16 kB
          Zheng Hu
        2. HBASE-21520.v1.patch
          3 kB
          Zheng Hu
        3. HBASE-21520.v2.patch
          12 kB
          Zheng Hu
        4. HBASE-21520.v3.patch
          18 kB
          Zheng Hu
        5. HBASE-21520.v4.patch
          18 kB
          Zheng Hu
        6. rowcol.txt
          114 kB
          Zheng Hu
        7. TestMultiColumnScanner.png
          83 kB
          Zheng Hu

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            openinx Zheng Hu
            openinx Zheng Hu
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Stop watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment