Details

    • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Not a Problem
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description


      Is there really a need to have a separate Crypto instance to sign SAML Assertions? Maybe we should just use the signature Crypto instance for this instead?

        Activity

        Colm O hEigeartaigh created issue -
        Marc Giger made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Assignee Colm O hEigeartaigh [ coheigea ] Marc Giger [ giger ]
        Resolution Not A Problem [ 8 ]
        Colm O hEigeartaigh made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Marc Giger
            Reporter:
            Colm O hEigeartaigh
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development