Velocity
  1. Velocity
  2. VELOCITY-526

Update our maven POM to match Apache standards.

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.6
    • Fix Version/s: 1.6
    • Component/s: Engine
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The following points are open

      • POM should extend the standard org.apache POM, this would reduce the amount of configuration from our POM.
      • POM and jar should be signed when deployed.
      • Strictly spoken, the POM itself can/should be voted on (we did vote on the POM as part of the last release)
      • We should also deploy a sources / javadoc jar

        Activity

        Henning Schmiedehausen created issue -
        Hide
        Laurie Chan added a comment -

        The packaging entry for the pom file in v1.5 is incorrect going from the copy at:
        http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.5/

        It states: <packaging>pom</packaging>
        and should be <packaging>jar</packaging>

        With the incorrect packaging clause a maven deploy-file will lose the jar file.
        From a quick browse of the subversion trunk it appears this is still incorrect for the engine component but has been set correctly for velocity-tools.

        Show
        Laurie Chan added a comment - The packaging entry for the pom file in v1.5 is incorrect going from the copy at: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.5/ It states: <packaging>pom</packaging> and should be <packaging>jar</packaging> With the incorrect packaging clause a maven deploy-file will lose the jar file. From a quick browse of the subversion trunk it appears this is still incorrect for the engine component but has been set correctly for velocity-tools.
        Hide
        Will Glass-Husain added a comment - - edited

        thanks! I changed the packaging clause.

        Show
        Will Glass-Husain added a comment - - edited thanks! I changed the packaging clause.
        Hide
        Nathan Bubna added a comment -

        I believe these have all been taken care of now.

        Show
        Nathan Bubna added a comment - I believe these have all been taken care of now.
        Nathan Bubna made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Fix Version/s 1.6 [ 12310290 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Mark Thomas made changes -
        Workflow jira [ 12399029 ] Default workflow, editable Closed status [ 12551576 ]
        Mark Thomas made changes -
        Workflow Default workflow, editable Closed status [ 12551576 ] jira [ 12552461 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Henning Schmiedehausen
            Reporter:
            Henning Schmiedehausen
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development