Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review
Reported by Richard:
Compared tag with source: OK
Checking POMs: OK
- I don't understand why you exclude UIMAJ-Core classes in the "enforce-compatibility" profile of Ruta. Shouldn't semver be removed after switching to japicmp?
POM check yields no changes in dependencies, skipping re-check of licenses.
Build on OS X: OK
Spot check signatures: OK ( and I actually have Peter's key in my keyring )
Install from Update Site into Eclipse: OK
- Update site identifies itself as "file:/D:/work/ruta/ruta-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/ruta" - A proper name would be better
- Before being able to install Ruta, I also need to add the normal UIMA update site. I though that update sites can refer to each other?
Code breaks out of boxes in PDF documentation on page 26.
Indentation depth in code examples in the documentation is not always the same.