Tuscany
  1. Tuscany
  2. TUSCANY-878

[SDO for C++] XSDHelper does not implement the getAppinfo method that is defined in the 2.01 specification

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: C++-SCA-Next
    • Fix Version/s: C++-SCA-Next
    • Component/s: C++ SDO
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The V2.01 specification describes a method called getAppinfo on XSDHelper. This method is not present in the Tuscany implementation.

      This omission may be because libxml2 does not provide access to this information.

        Activity

        Geoff Winn created issue -
        Geoff Winn made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Description The V2.01 specification describes a method called getApInfo on XSDHelper. This method is not present in the Tuscany implementation.

        This omission may be because libxml2 does not provide access to this information.
        The V2.01 specification describes a method called getAppinfo on XSDHelper. This method is not present in the Tuscany implementation.

        This omission may be because libxml2 does not provide access to this information.
        Summary [SDO for C++] XSDHelper does noy implement the getAppInfo method that is defined in the 2.01 specification [SDO for C++] XSDHelper does not implement the getAppinfo method that is defined in the 2.01 specification
        Jean-Sebastien Delfino made changes -
        Fix Version/s Cpp-current [ 12311062 ]
        Hide
        Pete Robbins added a comment -

        The spec does not define what AppInfo is and states that information MAY be returned. It's all a bit wishy-washy and it is a deliberate decision NOT to implement this.

        I suggest we do not implement such a method unless the spec is clear about what it's use and intended return value.

        Show
        Pete Robbins added a comment - The spec does not define what AppInfo is and states that information MAY be returned. It's all a bit wishy-washy and it is a deliberate decision NOT to implement this. I suggest we do not implement such a method unless the spec is clear about what it's use and intended return value.
        Jean-Sebastien Delfino made changes -
        Fix Version/s Cpp-M3 [ 12312265 ]
        Fix Version/s Cpp-current [ 12311062 ]
        Jean-Sebastien Delfino made changes -
        Fix Version/s Cpp-Next [ 12312266 ]
        Fix Version/s Cpp-M3 [ 12312265 ]
        Jean-Sebastien Delfino made changes -
        Fix Version/s C++-SCA-Next [ 12312266 ]
        ant elder made changes -
        Fix Version/s C++-SCA-Next [ 12312266 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Geoff Winn
            Reporter:
            Geoff Winn
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development