Tuscany
  1. Tuscany
  2. TUSCANY-3740

binding-comet-runtime in src distro but not in bin distro

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta1
    • Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta1
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      All

      Description

      Currently commented out in features/all. Remember to add suitable entries to bin license when adding as some files are under MIT license.

        Activity

        Simon Laws created issue -
        Simon Laws made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Assignee Simon Laws [ simonslaws ]
        Hide
        Simon Laws added a comment -

        Something a bit odd about licenses of the dependencies. Here's the new dependencies that this pulls in over what we already have.

        atmosphere-annotations-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        atmosphere-commons-0.6.1.jar, CDDL/GPL
        atmosphere-compat-jbossweb-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        atmosphere-compat-tomcat-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        atmosphere-compat-weblogic-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        atmosphere-jersey-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        atmosphere-runtime-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL?
        gson-1.4.jar, ASL2
        jersey-core-1.3.jar, https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
        jersey-server-1.3.jar, https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
        jsr311-api-1.1.1.jar http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php

        For the atmosphere ones the following say ASL2/CDDLv1.0 in the bundle manifest but the website (https://atmosphere.dev.java.net/) says CDDL/GPL if you follow the license link. So I'm minded mark them as CDDL in our LICENSE file.

        Show
        Simon Laws added a comment - Something a bit odd about licenses of the dependencies. Here's the new dependencies that this pulls in over what we already have. atmosphere-annotations-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? atmosphere-commons-0.6.1.jar, CDDL/GPL atmosphere-compat-jbossweb-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? atmosphere-compat-tomcat-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? atmosphere-compat-weblogic-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? atmosphere-jersey-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? atmosphere-runtime-0.6.1.jar, ASL2/CDDL or CDDL/GPL? gson-1.4.jar, ASL2 jersey-core-1.3.jar, https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html jersey-server-1.3.jar, https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html jsr311-api-1.1.1.jar http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php For the atmosphere ones the following say ASL2/CDDLv1.0 in the bundle manifest but the website ( https://atmosphere.dev.java.net/ ) says CDDL/GPL if you follow the license link. So I'm minded mark them as CDDL in our LICENSE file.
        Hide
        Simon Laws added a comment -

        fixed in trunk and beta1 branch

        Show
        Simon Laws added a comment - fixed in trunk and beta1 branch
        Simon Laws made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Simon Laws
            Reporter:
            Simon Laws
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development