XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 2.1.3
    • None
    • None

    Description

      Do we still need to support DNS proxying? It is disabled by default, via:

      {CONFIG, "proxy.config.dns.proxy.enabled", "", INK_INT, "0", RU_RESTART_TM, RR_NULL, RC_INT, "[0-1]", RA_NULL} {CONFIG, "proxy.config.dns.proxy_port", "", INK_INT, "53", RU_RESTART_TM, RR_NULL, RC_INT, "[0-65535]", RA_NULL}

      but there is also a #define at build time (DNS_PROXY) to completely disable it. I'm tempted to say that we ought to remove it entirely. Getting rid of it would eliminate a bunch of code, potentially allowing us to simplify a lot of code (particularly in the future, if/when we switch to something like c-ares).

      Thoughts?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            zwoop Leif Hedstrom
            zwoop Leif Hedstrom
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: